Development and testing of a stepwise thaw and dilute protocol for cryopreserved umbilical cord blood units
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is clinically important to maintain high viability and potency of umbilical cord blood units (CBUs) for transplantation during thawing. In the absence of a standard thawing protocol, this study was designed to develop one based on the consensus practice of transplant centers and address the shortage of dextran 40 thawing solution. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Frozen CBU aliquots were thawed using dextran 40 thawing solution while manipulating temperature and volume of diluent and mode of dilution. The effects of these on CD45+ and CD34+ cell viability were measured through annexin V and SYTOX green staining. The developed protocol was then used to compare dextran 40 and PLASMA-LYTE A thawing solutions and finally tested on whole CBUs. RESULTS: Step-by-step investigations resulted in the development of a protocol that thaws and dilutes CBUs with room temperature diluent to five times the original volume using two sequential dilutions separated by equilibration times. PLASMA-LYTE A diluent provided superior viability of CD45+ and CD34+ cells than dextran 40 and recovered more colony-forming units. However, both diluents were equally effective in maintaining stability of the thawed CBU for 4 hours. Moreover, the stem cell-enriched CD34+CD38- subpopulations appeared more resistant to cryoinjuries than their CD34+CD38+ counterpart. CONCLUSION: The developed thawing protocol recovers viable CD45+ and CD34+ cells above the standard thresholds and maintains CBU potency. PLASMA-LYTE A for thawing solution proved to be an efficient alternative to dextran 40. Finally, greater dilution should be avoided to maintain the viability of CD45+ cells and maximize graft cell dose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".