MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2622384190 · doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.7b00632

Organoboron-Based Photochromic Copolymers for Erasable Writing and Patterning

2017· article· en· W2622384190 on OpenAlexaff
Junwei Wang, Bixin Jin, Nan Wang, Tai Peng, Xiaoyu Li, Yunjun Luo, Suning Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhotochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhotochromismCopolymerPolymerMethacrylatePhotoisomerizationMonomerMaterials sciencePolymer chemistryPolymerizationAtom-transfer radical-polymerizationPhotochemistryFluorescenceQuenching (fluorescence)ChemistryNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryOpticsCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide We report herein the first examples of organoboron-based photochromic polymers. The synthesis of a series of blue fluorescent random copolymers bearing photochromic boron repeating units, poly[(6-B(ppy)Mes 2 )oxyhexyl methacrylate) m - r -( tert -butyl methacrylate) n ], ppy = 2-phenylpyridyl and Mes = mesityl, via atom transfer free radical polymerization (ATRP) has been accomplished. These new polymers display thermally reversible photochromism, switching color from colorless to deep blue, and fluorescence from bright sky blue to deep blue. By controlling the monomer ratio, the photoisomerization quantum efficiencies of the polymers can be tuned effectively. In addition, the number of boron units in the polymer has been found to have a significant impact on fluorescence quenching efficiency. The new organoboron-based polymers can be used effectively as a switchable/erasable ink on glass or paper substrate or for creating switchable/erasable patterns as neat polymer films.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicPhotochromic and Fluorescence ChemistryFrench-language works237,207