MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2622393809 · doi:10.1121/1.4987164

Triton: Practical pre-computed sound propagation for games and virtual reality

2017· article· en· W2622393809 on OpenAlexaff
Nikunj Raghuvanshi, John Tennant, John Snyder

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic Technology and Sound Studies
Canadian institutionsMicrosoft (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVirtual realityReverberationComputationAcousticsParametric statisticsSalientPerspective (graphical)Computer graphics (images)Artificial intelligenceAlgorithmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Triton is a pre-computed wave-based acoustics system recently shipped in the game “Gears of War 4.” Games and VR present exciting new opportunities for virtual acoustics by providing the player with scene-dependent reverberation cues and conveying information about visually occluded areas. Several technical challenges must be met. Scenes containing millions of polygons are common, with mixed indoor-outdoor spaces like broken buildings, courtyards, caves, and rocks. A viable technique must handle this complex visual geometry without users' intervention. The emphasis is on ensuring the resulting auralization is perceptually convincing, varying smoothly on source and listener motion in such scenes. Highly occluded cases with salient paths undergoing multiple edge-diffraction and scattering are common. Computational requirements are quite stringent. A fraction of a single CPU core must be used for acoustic calculations for many tens of moving sources. We discuss how these challenges shape Triton’s design. Pre-computation is used to minimize runtime cost. Wave simulation provides complete automation for complex scene geometry. The produced fields contain billions of responses that take terabytes of memory. A key contribution is compact encoding of this data in less than hundred megabytes: objective room acoustic parameters are approached from a novel perspective to aid in spatial compression. The resulting parametric framework is fast and practical for current games and VR applications. Video demonstrations will be shown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicMusic Technology and Sound StudiesFrench-language works237,207