Terapia ocupacional en la prevención de caídas de personas mayores: Aplicación de las medidas de seguridad en el domicilio. Una revisión sistemática
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolObjetivo: Conocer la eficacia de la aplicacion de las medidas de seguridad en domicilio para la prevencion de caidas en personas mayores. Metodo: Se ha realizado una busqueda sobre la efectividad de las medidas de seguridad en el domicilio para la prevencion de caidas en personas de la tercera edad. Se han consultado las siguientes bases de datos: Trip, NHS, Health Evidence Canada, Medline PubMed, BVS y CINAHL. Los estudios elegidos han sido evaluados con el instrumento lectura critica CASPe. Resultados: Se obtuvieron 17,197 articulos, de los cuales fueron seleccionados 17 de ellos, respondiendo a la pregunta de investigacion. Tras pasar el instrumento de lectura critica CASPe, fueron escogidos ocho articulos del tipo: estudios de cohortes, ensayo controlado aleatorizado y revision sistematica. Conclusion: La mayoria de los estudios coinciden en la necesidad de modificar el hogar de las personas mayores para la prevencion de caidas. Por tanto, los notables beneficios que conllevan las medidas de seguridad y los productos de apoyo son aspectos positivos para mejorar la calidad de vida de la poblacion anciana. EnglishObjective: To know the effectiveness of the implementation of security measures at home for the prevention of falls in elderly later. Method: The search about the effectiveness of the security measures at home to prevent falls in the elderly was carried out in these databases: Trip, NHS, Health Evidence Canada, Medline PubMed, BVS and CINAHL. Results: Selected studies were evaluated with the critical reading instrument CASPe. 17,197 articles were found, but were selected 17 of them, responding to the research question. After passing the instrument of critical reading CASPe, were chosen 8 articles of the type: cohort studies randomized controlled trial and systematic review. Conclusion: The majority of studies agree on the need to modify the home of the elderly people in order to prevention of falls. So, the remarkable benefits involving the security measures and the supporting products are positive aspects to improve the quality of life of the elderly population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.034 | 0.067 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".