MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2622499755

Contaminant Migration Through Soil-Cement Materials

2014· article· en· W2622499755 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRecycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCementSoil cementEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringGeologyMaterials scienceMetallurgy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To assess the long-term performance of soil-cement materials used in source-control remediation methods (i.e. cement-based solidification/stabilization), procedures to measure or estimate contaminant migration parameters are essential. Previous research indicates that diffusion may be an important mechanism in contaminant transport through soil-cement materials. However, there is a paucity of information regarding the diffusion of contaminants through these materials.\nThe development of a single-reservoir diffusion apparatus and methodology to assess the effective diffusion coefficient (De) and effective porosity (ne) of dissolved, conservative, inorganic chemicals for saturated, cured, monolithic soil-cement specimens is discussed. This is the only study known to investigate these parameters for these materials.\nThe results of tritiated water diffusion tests on 14 different soil-cement mixtures are presented and the influence of curing time and mixture properties such as water-to-cement ratio, cement content, and grain-size distribution are examined. Results suggest that, to determine reasonable assessments of the longer-term parameters, soil-cement samples should be cured for a minimum of 70 days before commencing diffusion testing. Values of ne (0.21 to 0.41) and De (2.50×10-10 m2/s to 7.0×10-10 m2/s) determined are similar to those previously determined for a number other low-hydraulic conductivity materials (i.e. saturated inactive clays).\nThe water content of the initial mixture is shown to have a substantial effect on the diffusive properties as the results indicate that both the total porosity (n) and the effective porosity, ne, generally increase with increasing initial water content. For the range of soils used in this investigation, grain-size distribution did not have a substantial effect on the values of ne or De determined from diffusion testing.\nThe adaptation of a double-reservoir diffusion testing apparatus and methodology to evaluate the distribution coefficient (Kd) and De of organic contaminants is also presented. This apparatus is used to evaluate Kd and De of benzene, ethylbenzene, naphthalene, and trichloroethylene for three soil-cement mixtures. Values of Kd (0 to 2.5 cm3/g depending on the compound and soil-cement mixture tested) determined from diffusion testing, batch testing, and theoretical estimates from the literature were in general agreement. Values of De for the organic compounds ranged from 1.50×10-10 to 3.0×10-10 m2/s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.123
Teacher spread0.121 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it