MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2622516888 · doi:10.82308/13433

Stochastic long-term production scheduling of the LabMag iron ore deposit in Labrador, Canada

2015· article· en· W2622516888 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Spleit

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIron oreTerm (time)GeologyMining engineeringArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In long-term production scheduling, which is of vital importance to a project's success and profitability, the goal is to determine a feasible extraction sequence that maximizes the discounted cash flows of a mine while also ensuring the target ore quantities and qualities are met. There is risk of the actual production deviating from what is planned due to geological variability, which is not considered by conventional mine designs and production schedules that are based on a single estimated ore body model. In order to address this issue, multiple simulations of an orebody can be created to represent its geological variability and allow for quantifying expected bounds, instead of single estimates, for grades, tonnages, and financial results. Beyond simply quantifying the geological uncertainty, a mine production schedule can be optimized while directly considering simulations in order to manage the geological risk.In this study, a set of geological simulations of the LabMag iron ore deposit in Labrador, Canada is generated in order to quantify the geological variability in an existing mining schedule and assess the schedule's performance. The ‘DBMAFSIM' algorithm is used to provide joint geostatistical simulation of spatially correlated variables of interest. First, a novel application of the method is used to jointly simulate the thicknesses of seven lithological layers, and then four correlated grades within each lithology are jointly simulated. The variability in an existing production schedule, designed based on a single deterministic geological model, is then evaluated using the simulations. This evaluation quantifies the potential deviations from expected production target grades and tonnages as well as the associated financial impact of these deviations. Subsequently, a production schedule optimization based on stochastic integer programming (SIP) is presented that aims to improve mine profitability while simultaneously managing the risk of production tonnage and quality deviations. In addition, the formulation has components for equipment and waste material management: the truck fleet requirements are minimized while ensuring that the number of required trucks is an increasing function to avoid unnecessary peaks; and the evolution of the pit is controlled so that space within the mined out pit is continuously provided to allow for tailings and waste rock to be replaced, thus minimizing the project's environmental footprint.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicMining Techniques and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207