Dynamic <i>k</i> -coverage planning for multiple events with mobile robots
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dynamic k -coverage planning for multiple events with mobile robots is proposed in the article. In mobile sensor networks, movement with the minimum energy for multiple events detection is a challenge which is discussed in the article. The problem of multiple events coverage is divided into two subproblems, namely mobile robots’ uniform deployment and nodes’ selection. Assuming that sparse mobile robots randomly deploy in the environment, mobile robots need to uniformly deploy firstly in order to effectively communicate with static nodes and extremely cover the entire region. A weighted-sub-Voronoi-half-gravity method and a weighted-sub-Voronoi-half-incenter method are presented for mobile robots’ uniform deployment. Two algorithms guarantee mobile robots are deploying with a higher coverage ratio. Meanwhile, analog game theoretic algorithm is proposed for nodes’ selection (static node’s selection and mobile robots’ selection). Only one static node is selected to detect an event and notifies candidate mobile robots which can communicate with the selected one of the event’s occurrence. Moreover, k mobile robots are selected for event coverage. The proposed algorithm achieves k -coverage of each event with less energy consumption. Performance analysis and simulations show that the proposed algorithm achieves very good results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it