A case series evaluating the serological response of adult asthma patients to the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Asthma is an independent risk factor for invasive pneumococcal disease; however, the immune response of adult asthma patients to pneumococcal vaccination is unknown. We explore the serologic response of patients with moderate to severe asthma to the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23). METHODS: Seventeen moderate to severe adult asthma patients that had not been vaccinated against pneumococcus over the 5 previous years were prospectively recruited from a tertiary care asthma clinic. Serum was analyzed for the presence of antibodies to five capsular polysaccharide (CP) antigens (6B, 9V, 19A, 19F, 23F) before and 4 weeks after PPSV23 vaccination. RESULTS: There was a wide variability in baseline anti-CP antibody concentrations. Other than for serotype 19A, our patients frequently have baseline anti-CP antibody concentrations below 1 µg/mL (35% for serotype 19F, 41% for serotypes 9V and 23F, and 59% for serotype 6B). All post-vaccination geometric mean antibody concentrations were significantly higher than baseline. In the 31 tests where the baseline antibody concentration was <1 µg/mL, 77.4% had at least a twofold increase post-vaccination. Despite this, a large proportion of post-vaccination anti-CP antibody concentrations remained <1 µg/mL (51.6% of tests). Nine patients had at least one anti-CP antibody concentration <1 µg/mL post-vaccination. There was no difference between these patients and the remaining eight patients in demographic or clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with moderate to severe asthma have variable baseline and low post-vaccination antibody concentrations to common CP antigens included in the PPSV23 vaccine. The clinical relevance of these observations remains to be determined since the threshold concentration in adults required for clinical protection from invasive pneumococcal disease is uncertain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".