MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2622888671 · doi:10.1190/geo2017-0031.1

Extraction of reflected events from sonic-log waveforms using the Karhunen-Loève transform

2017· article· en· W2622888671 on OpenAlexaff
Junxiao Li, K. A. Innanen, Guo Tao

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsGeoscience BCUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSlownessAcousticsReflection (computer programming)BoreholeWaveformGeologyAmplitudeSIGNAL (programming language)Computer sciencePrincipal component analysisPhysicsOpticsSeismologyArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sonic-reflection logging, a recently developed borehole geophysical scheme, is in principle capable of providing a clear view of outside the well bore. In this type of acoustic well logging, a key technical obstacle is that the reflected wave signal is almost entirely obscured by the directly arriving P-, S-, and Stoneley wave modes. Effective extraction of these reflection signals from the full acoustic waveforms is therefore a critical data-processing step. We have examined the use of the Karhunen-Loève (KL) transform, combined with a band-limiting filter, as a technique for the extraction of reflections of interest from a mixture with directly arriving wave modes of much higher amplitude. Under the assumption that large energy (squared-amplitude) differences exist between each wave component, the direct Stoneley wave, S-wave, and the P-wave are eliminated sequentially by subtracting the most significant principal components, after which the remaining signal is seen to be dominated by reflected events. Thereafter, the extracted reflections can be used in migration to provide interpretable images of the structures outside the borehole. Synthetic data are used to develop and justify our procedure for subtraction of appropriate KL principal components. Laboratory data are used to demonstrate in detail the suppression of unwanted modes. For comparison, the multiscale slowness-time-coherence method is applied to extract reflections from the same data set. The procedure is exemplified on a field data case with attention paid in particular to the consequences to imaging of near-borehole structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207