The impact of harvesting location on the physiological indicators of the American lobster (Homarus americanus H. Milne Edwards, 1837) (Decapoda: Nephropidae) during live storage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shore-based live holding is a required step for post-harvest economic success in the American lobster (Homarus americanus H. Milne Edwards, 1837) fishery. This study evaluated and quantified nutritional condition and gene expression of hepatopancreas during live storage of American lobsters harvested from inshore and offshore locations in Nova Scotia, Canada in early winter. Crude-fat percentage of lobster hepatopancreas and plasma biochemical indicators in haemolymph were used to evaluate the nutritional status of lobsters during live storage. Hepatopancreas crude-fat levels were significantly higher in lobsters from inshore in contrast to offshore locations. Similarly, inshore lobsters were easily distinguished from offshore lobsters because of higher haemolymph Brix and plasma triglyceride, cholesterol, and total protein concentrations. Elevated plasma aspartate aminotransferase activity in inshore lobsters when compared to offshore lobsters suggests that handling practices in the inshore fishery have more impact on harvested lobsters than offshore fishing practices. Inshore lobsters were nevertheless able to recover by four weeks in storage with no obvious mid- and long-term effects. Microarray analysis of hepatopancreas tissue resulted in gene expression profiles that routinely separated inshore from offshore lobsters at all storage time points. The biochemistry of haemolymph and the crude-fat and molecular gene expression analysis of hepatopancreas proved to be useful tools for differentiating lobster harvesting locations. Lobsters harvested inshore in January and stored at the wharf for one month in contrast to lobsters harvested fresh in February had similar gene expression and biochemical profiles; indicating that there is no disadvantage to the live-storage of lobsters caught early in the winter, compared to fresh caught lobsters a month later.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".