MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with ribociclib + letrozole: Results from MONALEESA-2.

2017· article· en· W2623152276 on OpenAlexaff
Sunil Verma, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Howard A. Burris, Mario Campone, Emilio Alba, David Chandiwana, Stephanie Manson, Santosh Sutradhar, Mauricio Monaco, Wolfgang Janni

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Canadian institutionsBaker Hughes (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLetrozoleMedicineInternal medicineHazard ratioQuality of life (healthcare)PlaceboOncologyBreast cancerNauseaContext (archaeology)CancerConfidence intervalTamoxifen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1020 Background: In the MONALEESA-2 trial, ribociclib + letrozole significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and showed higher overall response rates vs letrozole alone in HR+, HER2– ABC. To place these clinical results in the context of patient experience, here we present key patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including HRQoL. Methods: 668 patients were randomized (1:1); 334 each to the ribociclib + letrozole and placebo + letrozole arms. PROs were evaluated during treatment and at progression using the EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23, and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. Changes from baseline in all subscales were analyzed using a linear mixed-effect model and time to 10% deterioration was compared between treatment arms using the stratified log-rank test. Results: Questionnaire compliance rates were high (≥90%). During treatment, HRQoL (global health status/QoL score) was maintained and similar in both treatment arms. At progression/end of treatment, HRQoL worsened numerically in both arms. Time to definitive 10% deterioration of HRQoL was similar between treatment groups, slightly favoring the ribociclib + letrozole arm (hazard ratio: 0.89; 95% confidence interval: 0.67–1.18). No statistically or clinically relevant differences were observed for key symptoms using EORTC QLQ-C30 including fatigue, nausea, and vomiting. There was a clinically relevant ( > 5 points) improvement in pain from baseline to post-baseline (up to Cycle 15) in the ribociclib + letrozole arm while there was only mild improvement ( < 5 points) observed in the placebo + letrozole arm. Conclusions: In addition to significantly improving PFS, ribociclib + letrozole maintains HRQoL when compared with letrozole + placebo. A numerical trend was observed favoring ribociclib + letrozole for pain reduction. Clinical trial information: NCT01958021.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesFrench-language works237,207