Pc Based Measurement Of The Heat Of Combustion Of A Solid Fuel Using Oxygen Bomb Calorimeter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper describes an experimental system developed for measurement of the heat of combustion of a sample of solid fuel. The system is set up to use an Oxygen Bomb Calorimeter together with a temperature sensor. A data acquisition system is used to accurately record temperature versus time response before, during and after the combustion of the fuel sample. The data acquisition system includes an analog to digital converter (IOtech Personal DAQ 3005 with USB connection) a standard software package (DASYLab) to obtain the measurement under program control to determine the observed temperature rise of the system following combustion of a carefully weighed sample of solid fuel. The data processing includes several corrections to the measured temperature rise in order to determine the heating value of the fuel. The oxygen bomb calorimeter can be operated as an adiabatic system to eliminate the heat gain/loss during the experiment. However, the experiment is carried out in a non-adiabatic system to allow a greater insight in this experiment and to enhance its pedagogical value. This experimental system has been developed for an undergraduate laboratory in thermodynamics for Mechanical/Chemical Engineering students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".