MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2623217756 · doi:10.1002/sia.6248

Magnesium oxide modified with various iodine‐containing compounds––Surface studies

2017· article· en· W2623217756 on OpenAlex
Ewa M. Iwanek, Urszula Ulkowska, Marek Gliński

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface and Interface Analysis · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLayered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsSheridan College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryHalideCatalysisFourier transform infrared spectroscopyMagnesiumIodineInorganic chemistryInfraredAttenuated total reflectionInfrared spectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)AcroleinOrganic chemistryChemical engineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The activity of iodine‐modified MgO in transfer hydrogenation of acrolein with alcohols can be significantly higher than that of unmodified MgO. Data from literature and our previous studies indicate that the initial source of a halide influences the surface properties and hence the activity of the obtained catalytic system. The aim of this paper is to present a systematic study on the influence of the initial source of a halide on the activity and surface properties of MgO‐based catalysts. For the sake of comparison, results for an MgO sample subjected to the same procedure as the iodine‐modified catalysts (MgO‐CH 3 OH) are included in the manuscript. The following order of activity was observed: MgO‐I 2 > MgO‐MgI 2 > MgO‐HI > > MgO‐KI > MgO = MgO‐CH 3 OH. The second part of the study consisted of characterization studies aimed at determining the strengths of Brønsted basic and acidic sites, total concentrations of acidic and basic sites, topography of the surfaces, elemental composition, differences in the chemical environment of the surface ions, as well as relative amounts of different bands in an attenuated total reflectance–Fourier transform infrared spectrum, which correspond to the bonds present on the surface of the samples. Some parameters were independent of the iodine precursor used (eg, the breadth of the Mg 2p signal), whereas others strongly varied from one sample to another (eg, the range of strengths of the Brønsted acidic and basic sites). The ratio of 2 carbonate bands of the attenuated total reflectance–Fourier transform infrared spectra of the modified catalysts shows a trend which corresponds to the order of activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it