Calgary Family Intervention Model Approach ( CFIM ) Prevention of Food Borne Disease and Self Care Agency for Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Food borne disease (FBD) is a disease caused by consumption of contaminated food. The problem is, school aged children are vulnerable Food borne disease because of household food contamination. This indicates the family hygiene as a food handler mainly mother during preparing the food still need to be improved. The study design used pre experiment one group pre and post test design with a sample of 35 respondents namely, 4th grade students with their parents and 5th grade students with their parentsin Jatirejoyoso Kepanjen Primary School. Demographic data, CFAM (Calgary Family Assessment Model), knowledge, attitudes, practices family and children's self-care agency in PHBS at school were used.The results was an increase in knowledge and attitudes of families, family practice and self child care agency did not change after the intervention CFIM for 4 sessions. CFAM on the functional components of the daily activity was lacking mostly, thus affecting the unchanged practice. While children self-care agency was affected by school environment such as affordability of snacks. Health professionals are expected to optimize School Health Unit program to provide education about clean and healthy living behaviors at the school community (students, teachers and school employees) and family assistance through a cadre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".