MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2623495709 · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(17)30050-5

The inexorable death of first peoples: an open letter to the WHO

2017· letter· en· W2623495709 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Philippe Charlier, Saudamini Deo

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Planetary Health · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScopusIndigenousObsolescencePolitical scienceMedicineLibrary scienceMEDLINELawBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indigenous communities experience some of the highest rates of suicide globally, especially among young people. This worrying epidemic has already been shown in Inuit communities of North America and Greenland1Crawford A Inuit take action toward suicide prevention.Lancet. 2016; 388: 1036-1038Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (12) Google Scholar, 2Webster PC Canada's indigenous suicide crisis.Lancet. 2016; 387: 2494Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar and the Amazonian groups of Guyana, but recently has been shown to extend to Australian First Nations people (mainly Aboriginal individuals).3Cousins S Suicide in Indigenous Australians: a “catastrophic crisis”.Lancet. 2017; 389: 242Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar The international scientific community has already been alerted to the obsolescence of WHO's definition of health,4Charlier P Coppens Y Malaurie J et al.A new definition of health? An open letter of autochthonous peoples and medical anthropologists to the WHO.Eur J Intern Med. 2017; 37: 33-37Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar and the need to adapt patterns of suicide prevention procedures used in high-income areas to indigenous communities.5Charlier P Malaurie J Wasserman D et al.The EPA guidance on suicide treatment and prevention needs to be adjusted to fight the epidemics of suicide at the North Pole area and other autochthonous communities.Eur Psychiatry. 2017; 41: 129-131Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar But beyond advocating for interdisciplinary care—mainly anthropological and medical, notably in its psychiatric aspect—could the WHO (urgently) formally acknowledge suicide in indigenous groups as a key issue to stop this seemingly universal phenomenon? The problem of increasing suicide rates in indigenous communities is diffuse and affects the entire planet. Diverse ethnic groups are unable to cope with the loss of their benchmarks caused by rapid modernisation. In the absence of any flexible and speedy reaction, the risk is simple: the inexorable death of the first peoples, and the health community's total culpability. We declare no competing interests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0060.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Planetary HealthSame topicSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesFrench-language works237,207