MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2623865554

Interview with John G. Thompson and Jacques Tits

2009· article· en· W2623865554 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHistory and Theory of Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of California, IrvineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillFreie Universität BerlinConcordia UniversityMathematical Association of AmericaCollege of CharlestonFlorida Atlantic UniversityGeorgia State UniversityUniversity of MontanaUniversity of LouisvilleUniversity of WyomingUniversity of CambridgeBard CollegeUniversity of PittsburghUniversity of WashingtonPrinceton UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityNorth Carolina State UniversityUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignAuburn UniversityState University of New YorkYork UniversityNorthwestern UniversityWorcester Polytechnic InstituteBrown UniversityUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonTemple UniversityCalifornia Institute of TechnologyGeorgia Institute of TechnologyEmory UniversityUniversity at AlbanyHarvard UniversityUniversidad del AtlánticoNational Science FoundationSt. Olaf CollegeLakehead UniversityEducational Advancement FoundationSan Francisco State UniversityUniversity of California, San DiegoYale UniversityNorth Dakota State UniversityUniversity of Southern California
KeywordsPsychologyArtPsychoanalysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: left">John G. Thompson and Jacques Tits are the recipients of the 2008 Abel Prize of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters. On May 19, 2008, prior to the Abel Prize celebration in Oslo, Thompson and Tits were jointly interviewed by Martin Raussen of Aalborg University and Christian Skau of the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. This interview originally appeared in the September 2008 issue of the <em>Newsletter of the European</em><em>Mathematical Society.</em>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.679
Threshold uncertainty score0.891

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it