MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2623865554

Interview with John G. Thompson and Jacques Tits

2009· article· en· W2623865554 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Martin Raußen, Christian Skau

Bibliographic record

VenueVBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHistory and Theory of Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of California, IrvineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillFreie Universität BerlinConcordia UniversityMathematical Association of AmericaCollege of CharlestonFlorida Atlantic UniversityGeorgia State UniversityUniversity of MontanaUniversity of LouisvilleUniversity of WyomingUniversity of CambridgeBard CollegeUniversity of PittsburghUniversity of WashingtonPrinceton UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityNorth Carolina State UniversityUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignAuburn UniversityState University of New YorkYork UniversityNorthwestern UniversityWorcester Polytechnic InstituteBrown UniversityUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonTemple UniversityCalifornia Institute of TechnologyGeorgia Institute of TechnologyEmory UniversityUniversity at AlbanyHarvard UniversityUniversidad del AtlánticoNational Science FoundationSt. Olaf CollegeLakehead UniversityEducational Advancement FoundationSan Francisco State UniversityUniversity of California, San DiegoYale UniversityNorth Dakota State UniversityUniversity of Southern California
KeywordsPsychologyArtPsychoanalysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

John G. Thompson and Jacques Tits are the recipients of the 2008 Abel Prize of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters. On May 19, 2008, prior to the Abel Prize celebration in Oslo, Thompson and Tits were jointly interviewed by Martin Raussen of Aalborg University and Christian Skau of the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. This interview originally appeared in the September 2008 issue of the Newsletter of the EuropeanMathematical Society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet)Same topicHistory and Theory of MathematicsFrench-language works237,207