Nota crítica sobre Francisco Galán Vélez, Una metafísica para tiempos posmetafísicos. La propuesta de Bernard Lonergan de una Metametodología, México: Universidad Iberoamericana, 2015, 488 p. A Critical Note about Francisco Galán Vélez, Una Metafísica para tiempos posmetafísicos. La propuesta de Bernard Lonergan de una Metametodología, Mexico: Universidad Iberoamericana, 2015, 488 p.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta nota crítica estudia la obra reciente del Prof. Francisco Galán en su proyecto de presentar una metafísica para tiempos pos-metafísicos, es decir, el retomar la tarea de reconstruir la estructura inteligible de la realidad a partir del reconocimiento de la estruc- tura del conocimiento humano en sus distintos patrones de experiencia y articulado por el deseo desasido de conocer. El Profesor Galán encuentra inspiración en el trabajo del Jesui- ta canadiense Bernard Lonergan y presenta su proyecto como un comentario extendido y una propuesta para considerar seriamente las propuestas del mismo. This is a critical note of the recent book of Prof. Francisco Galán and his project of introducing a Meaphysics for post-metaphysical times, i.e., his endeavour to undertake a reconstruction of the intelligible structure of reality from the discovering of the structure of human knowledge in the di erent pa ern of experiences and articulated by a pure desire of knowing. Professor Galán fins inspiration in the works of the Canadian Jesuit philosopher Bernard Lonergan and introduces his own project as an extended comment and a proposal to consider seriously Lonergan’s insights.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.012 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".