MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Phase 2 study of pembrolizumab (pembro) monotherapy for previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC): KEYNOTE-086 cohort A.

2017· article· en· W2624483458 on OpenAlexaff
Sylvia Adams, Peter Schmid, Hope S. Rugo, Eric P. Winer, Delphine Loirat, Ahmad Awada, David W. Cescon, Hiroji Iwata, Mario Campone, Rita Nanda, Rina Hui, Giuseppe Curigliano, Deborah Toppmeyer, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Sherene Loi, Shani Paluch–Shimon, Deborah Card, Jing Zhao, Vassiliki Karantza, Javier Cortés

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePembrolizumabCohortInternal medicineBreast cancerMetastatic breast cancerOncologyCancerTolerabilityAdverse effectImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1008 Background: In KEYNOTE-012, pembro showed durable activity and manageable safety in patients (pts) with PD-L1+ mTNBC. Cohort A of KEYNOTE-086 (NCT02447003) examined the efficacy/safety of pembro in previously treated mTNBC, regardless of PD-L1 expression. Methods: Pts with centrally confirmed mTNBC, ≥1 prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, and ECOG PS 0-1 had pembro 200 mg Q3W for up to 24 mo; imaging q 9 wk for the first 12 mo, then q 12 wk. Clinically stable pts with PD could remain on pembro until PD confirmed on next assessment. Primary endpoints: ORR (RECIST v1.1, central review) in all pts and pts with PD-L1+ tumors, and safety. Secondary endpoints: DOR, disease control rate (DCR; CR + PR + SD ≥24 wk), PFS, and OS. Planned enrollment was 160 pts; analysis based on data as of Nov 10, 2016. Results: 60% of screened PD-L1-evaluable pts had PD-L1+ tumors (combined positive score ≥1%). Of 170 pts enrolled (100% women; median age 54 y), 44% had ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 51% had elevated LDH, 74% had visceral mets and 62% had PD-L1+ tumors. After a median follow-up of 10.9 mo, 9 (5%) pts remained on pembro. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) of any grade and grade 3-4 occurred in 60% and 12% of pts, respectively; 4% discontinued due to TRAEs. There were no deaths due to AE. Overall ORR was 5% regardless of PD-L1 expression (Table). Best overall response was 0.6% CR, 4% PR, 21% SD; not evaluable (3%). DCR was 8% (95% CI 4-13). Median DOR was 6.3 mo (range 1.2+ to 10.3+); 5 (63%) responders w/o PD at data cutoff. Median PFS and OS were 2.0 mo (95% CI 1.9-2.0) and 8.9 mo (95% CI 7.2-11.2), with 6-mo rates of 12% and 69%, respectively. ORR was numerically lower in pts with poor prognostic factors (e.g., high LDH, liver/visceral mets; Table). Conclusions: In KEYNOTE-086 Cohort A, pembro monotherapy showed manageable safety and durable responses in a subset of pts with heavily pretreated mTNBC. Randomized studies of monotherapy and combination therapy are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02447003. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.525
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations126
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207