Health Service Needs for Urban Indigenous Women with Co-Occurring Health Concerns
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Addressing inequities in health service access and utilization among Indigenous Peoples is complex, especially for urban Indigenous women with co-occurring health conditions and addiction issues. Services for co-occurring health conditions are compartmentalized and disjointed. Urban Indigenous women are particularly at risk of falling through the cracks of the service system. With this in mind, we designed a study that would provide information about how best to provide services to urban Indigenous women with multiple health challenges. The paper reports from the first phase of the study which involved interviews with service providers and decision makers. Data were collected through in-depth interviews. All the key stakeholders expressed the view that services for co-occurring health needs should be based on Indigenous women’s understandings of culturally safe and responsive care. The results suggest that services for co-occurring health concerns must begin with ensuring Indigenous women’s safety. Women who experience safe health services are more likely to feel empowered throughout the process of their healing journey. The lack of safety in health services can be considered as a key factor in Indigenous Canadians’ inequitable access to health services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".