MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Phase II study of oral ENMD-2076 administered to patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma: A trial of the Princess Margaret Phase II Consortium.

2014· article· en· W2624770203 on OpenAlexaff
Cristina Martín-Lorente, David S.P. Tan, Neesha C. Dhani, Marcus O. Butler, Helen Mackay, Michelle Wilson, Stéphanie Lheureux, Hal W. Hirte, Stephen Welch, Johanne I. Weberpals, Ghatage Prafullg, Katia Tonkin, Lisa Wang, Anna Haley, Stephanie Capobianco, Amit M. Oza

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaCancer Care OntarioJuravinski Cancer CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer CentreOttawa HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhases of clinical researchOvarian carcinomaOncologyInternal medicineOvarian cancerPhase (matter)Clinical trialCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS5620 Background: Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) represents nearly 15% of all epithelial ovarian carcinomas (EOC). This histology is associated with resistance to chemotherapy and a worse prognosis. VEGF has been found to be strongly expressed in OCCC. Somatic mutations in the ARID1A (the AT-rich interactive domain 1A gene that encodes BAF250a, a key component of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex) has also been demonstrated in 46-57% of OCCCs. Alteration of this chromatin remodeling complex may result in upregulation and overexpression of Aurora A. ENMD-2076 is a multi-target kinase inhibitor, which has selective activity against Aurora A and multiple antiangiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis targets. In a Phase II study in platinum-resistant EOC, 58% of the patients treated with single agent ENMD-2076 showed partial response or stable disease, the PFS at 6 month was 22% with a median time to progression of 3.6 months. Two out of 3 patients with OCCC who were enrolled had a longer PFS than the median. Methods: This is a multi-center, Phase II study, in patients with recurrent OCCC to assess response rate and progression free survival rate, as primary endpoints, and duration of overall response, as a secondary endpoint, of single agent ENMD-2076 275 mg/day. Exploratory endpoints include association of somatic mutations in PI3KCA, ARID1A and PTEN, and ARID1A and PTEN expression with outcome and response. Patients ECOG ≤2, with histologically documented diagnosis of recurrence OCCC, any number of prior treatment regimens (chemotherapy, biologics or other target therapies except for Aurora A targeted therapies), and measurable disease (RECIST criteria 1.1) are eligible. Based on data from previous studies, a sample size of 36 patients will provide 95% power to detect an improvement in response rate from 10 to 30% and 90% power to detect an increase in 6 month PFS from 20 to 40%. Since September 2013, 6 patien Clinical trial information: NCT01914510.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment→French-language works237,207→