Divergence, Convergence ou Crossvergence: une Réflexion sur l’Identité Supranationale en Asie de l’Est dans le Contexte de la Mondialisation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A la difference des deux approches divergence et convergence, la crossvergence signifie une integration des influences culturelles et ideologiques qui aboutira a un systeme unique de valeurs qui emprunte a la fois la culture nationale et l’ideologie economique, d’ou l’idee de cosmopolitisme qui represente une identite supranationale des peuples de nationalites differentes. L’article discute de la possibilite de construire un «cosmopolitisme» en Asie de l’Est, ou , au fur et a mesure du renforcement de la cooperation et de l’echange, les gens commencent a prendre en compte l’interdependance entre eux, a disposer d’une vision plus large sur le monde et eux-memes, a reflechir d’une maniere plus profonde sur ce qui est autour d’eux, et a voir d’une autre facon les similitudes que presentent les membres de la meme communaute et les differences interpersonnelles et intercommunautaires. En outre, un danger que l’on ne peut negliger est souligne par l’auteur dans la derniere partie: Le nationalisme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.041 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".