MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2624859695

Nowcasting Space Weather Impacts on Polar HF Communications

2016· article· en· W2624859695 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Neil Rogers, F. Honary, E.M. Warrington

Bibliographic record

VenueLancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronal mass ejectionSpace weatherIonosphereEarth's magnetic fieldEnvironmental scienceRiometerMeteorologyNowcastingPhysicsSolar windRadio waveInterplanetary spaceflightGeophysicsRemote sensingGeologyMagnetic field
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aircraft operating on trans-polar routes require reliable HF (3-30 MHz) radio communications links to be maintained throughout each flight. However, solar flares and interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICME) can often result in enhancements of the electron density in the Earth’s ionosphere, which can strongly attenuate HF radio waves in the Polar Regions. In some cases this can result in the cancellation or diversion of flights for periods of several days. This paper describes the scientific basis for an online service for airlines that predicts HF radio coverage for polar flight routes by combining nowcast maps of HF absorption in the lower (D-region) ionosphere with ray-tracing radio propagation algorithms. The absorption maps are generated by assimilating real-time measurements of cosmic radio noise absorption from 25 ‘relative ionospheric opacity meters’ (riometers) deployed across Canada and Scandinavia. These data are combined with real-time X-ray flux and energetic (1-100 MeV) proton flux measurements from the NASA / NOAA Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites. The effect of geomagnetic shielding of solar protons (which limits HF absorption at lower latitudes) and the location of the auroral absorption zones (which result from magnetospheric electron precipitation) are also parameterised and optimised using indices of geomagnetic activity. The latter are determined either from ground-based magnetometers or predicted from real-time Solar Wind / Interplanetary Magnetic Field measurements from the NASA / NOAA Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) stationed at the L1 Earth-Sun Lagrange point. The performance of the real-time HF absorption model is demonstrated using several days of data recorded during a recent solar proton event and subsequent geomagnetic storm. The new data assimilation model reduces the root-mean-square error in riometer absorption by up to 30% in comparison with NOAA’s standard D-region Absorption Prediction (DRAP) model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)→Same topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics→French-language works237,207→