MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2625389969

Investigation into the cause(s) of a mass mortality of a long-lived species in a Provincial Park and an evaluation of recovery strategies.

2017· dissertation· en· W2625389969 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Donnell Marie-Leah Gasbarrini

Bibliographic record

VenueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLived experienceGeographyGerontologyHistoryDemographyPsychologyMedicineSociologyPsychotherapist
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mass mortality events (MMEs) are rapidly occurring and localized events, and have been
\nreported to remove up to 90% of individuals in a population. MMEs can be especially damaging
\nto population persistence for long-lived species, such as chelonians. While MMEs have been
\nregarded as rare events, they are predicted to occur with increased frequency as environmental
\nstochasticity associated with climate change increases. Unfortunately, a limited understanding of
\nthe causes and consequences of MMEs remains. In the current thesis, I investigated the potential
\ncauses of an acute MME of at-risk Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii) at Misery Bay
\nProvincial Park on Manitoulin Island, Ontario in which approximately 50% of the population
\nsuccumbed to mortality, and used population viability analyses (PVAs) to examine strategies to
\nrecover the population. Because the park includes relatively pristine habitat in which most of the regular anthropogenic threats to turtles are absent, the hypotheses I tested to explain the mortality
\nconsidered natural threats, including disease, failed overwintering, and predation in the winter
\nand active seasons. I determined that the most likely cause of death was a large-scale predation
\nevent, which received support from several lines of evidence, including the presence of predators
\nwithin the park, a failed predation attempt on a live Blanding’s turtle, and the meticulous
\ndestruction of a turtle decoy stationed where carcasses were found. The recovery strategies
\nexamined included nest protection, introduction of juveniles, introduction of adults, and a nest
\nprotection plus introduction of juvenile combination strategy. PVAs determined that the most effective recovery strategy for this population would be a combination of nest protection and the
\nannual introduction of 25 two-year-old females for a period of 50 years. The information gained
\nthrough my study has led to the recommendation of appropriate conservation strategies for this
\npopulation, and will aid in the management of future MMEs elsewhere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University)Same topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207