Accelerated hydrolysis of boronic acid in a modified poly(amidoamine) dendrimer: identification of a factor leading to the production of an impurity in boronic acid containing poly(amidoamine) dendrimers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The preparation of boronic acid containing dendrimers is still a difficult task in dendrimer chemistry. In this investigation, an unanticipated hydrolysis product (4) was identified during the preparation of (G:2)-PAMAM-dendri-(4-phenyl boronic acid) 14 (3) by acquiring its 1 H NMR, 13 C NMR, and UV–vis absorption spectra and IR spectra and comparing them with those of 4-hydroxylbenzoic acid (5). Furthermore, an Alizarin Red S staining analysis, ICP-MS, and 11 B NMR spectrum indicated the lack of boronic acid in 4. Finally, treatment of 3 with hydrogen peroxide gave a product that was determined to be identical to dendrimer 4. By analyzing the formation of 4 under various conditions, the presence of numerous primary amines in a PAMAM dendrimer did accelerate the hydrolysis of peripheral boronic acid. This investigation revealed an apparent intrinsic problem that needs to be overcome during the preparation of boronic acid containing dendrimers and related boronic acid containing macromolecules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".