MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2625611384 · doi:10.4157/ejgeo.12.12

Current Status and Issues of Bilingualism in Canada

2017· article· en· W2625611384 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Taro Oishi

Bibliographic record

VenueE-journal GEO · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroscience of multilingualismCurrent (fluid)PsychologyPhysicsNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2017年に連邦結成150周年を迎えるカナダは,英語とフランス語を公用語とする二言語国家として知られるが,その実態は複雑であり,必ずしも正確に理解されていない.そこで本稿では,言語景観と二言語話者人口に注目し,カナダの二言語主義の現状と課題を現地調査と国勢調査に基づいて解説する.カナダでは1969年に制定された公用語法により,連邦政府の施設は二言語で表記され,二言語でサービスを提供することになっている.一方で,各州の行政はそれぞれの法令に基づいている.したがって,同じ場所に立地していても,連邦と州の施設では用いられている言語が異なる場合がある.また,英語圏の大都市において二言語話者人口の割合が非都市地域よりもやや高い傾向がみられるものの,ケベック州をはじめとするフランス語を母語とする人口の割合が高い地域において,二言語話者人口の割合が高い傾向はあまり変わっていない.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.010
Science and technology studies0.0220.010
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE-journal GEOSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207