MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2625616732 · doi:10.9771/ccrh.v10i26.18667

UMA RACIONALIDADE CONSTRANGIDA: A EXPERIÊNCIA DA GOVERNANÇA URBANA EM SALVADOR

2006· article· pt· W2625616732 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCaderno CRH · 2006
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Societal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsGovernoContext (archaeology)HumanitiesPolitical scienceRationalityLegitimacyPoliticsGeographyPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O artigo analisa as condições de implantação de dispositivos de governança urbana na cidade de Salvador (1993/1996), fundado no paradigma de “bom governo” que articula eficácia com justiça social, num contexto marcado por profunda crise de legitimidade do executivo municipal. Avalia as condições de governabilidade e a capacidade do governo local na implantação de políticas e no exercício da autonomia municipal, num quadro de profundo conflito e embate da Prefeitura com outras instâncias intergovernamentais. A partir da análise de quatro políticas locais (o Planejamento Urbano; o Orçamento Participativo; o Conselho do Carnaval e o Programa Cidade Mãe) apresenta os instrumentos de microrregulação societal implantados, que, segundo a autora, constróem um modelo de gestão assentada numa “racionalidade constrangida”, que expande a cooperação na base; verticaliza e centraliza o controle dos programas no núcleo central do governo, evitando expor-se a pactos sociais mais amplos, restringindo a universalização do aprendizado e vivência democrática. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Governança urbana; políticas sociais; pobreza; participação social e democratização. A constrained rationality: the experience of the urban governance in Salvador Anete Brito Leal Ivo This article analyzes the condition for implementing urban governance devices in the city of Salvador (1993/1996) based on the “good government paradigm”, articulating effectiveness with social justice in a context stressed by profound crisis of legitimacy of the local power. It evaluates the governance conditions and local government capability in implanting the policies and in the use of the municipal autonomy, in a profound conflict, as well as the impact of the municipality on other intergovernmental instances. Based on the analysis of the four local policies (Urban planning; Participant Budget, Carnival Council and Mother City Program) it presents the implemented micro-regulation social instruments. The latter, according to the author, establish a management model based on a “constrained rationality”, which expands the base cooperation, uprights and centralizes the control of the programs in the governmental central nucleus, thus preventing the exposure to more ample social pacts, restricting the learning universalization and the democratic experience. KEY WORDS: Urban governance, social politics, poverty, democratization and Social Participation. Publicação Online do Caderno CRH: http://www.cadernocrh.ufba.br

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it