MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2625714936

Défense, négociation et subversion de la thèse de l’ordre naturel dans les jeux de rôle participatifs en environnement virtuel : Le cas de la communauté goréenne de Second Life

2017· article· fr· W2625714936 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLoading... · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Games and Media
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article porte sur les strategies et tactiques mises en œuvre par les joueurs dans le cadre des jeux de role participatifs en environnement virtuel (JRPEV) goreens organises dans Second Life, qualifies de « jeux a these subvertie » et constituant une transfictionnalisation des romans de science-fiction The Chronicles of Gor, de John Norman. Sept types d’actions strategiques et tactiques ont ete mises au jour, soit la cloture hermeneutique, la cloture sociotechnique, la cloture legale, la cloture narrative, la cloture scenaristique, l’acculturation formelle et l’acculturation informelle, reposant toutes sur le concept de « signification privilegiee », de Stuart Hall (1989), et de « cloture discursive », de Stanlez Deetz (1991). Ces strategies et tactiques sont alimentees par des textes exogenes que les joueurs font circuler dans l’ecosysteme transtextuel goreen, des intertextes aux metatextes, en passant par les para-, hyper-, auto- et archi- textes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it