MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2625891484 · doi:10.1161/str.47.suppl_1.wmp34

Abstract WMP34: Use of Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Patients Without a Stroke (Stroke Mimics): Findings From the get With the Guidelines Stroke Registry

2016· article· en· W2625891484 on OpenAlexaff
Ying Xian, Jerome J. Federspiel, Margueritte Cox, Adrian F. Hernandez, Andrzej S. Kosinski, Janet Prvu Bettger, Phillip J. Schulte, Barbara L. Lytle, Gregg C. Fonarow, Eric E. Smith, Deepak L. Bhatt, Lee H. Schwamm, Eric D. Peterson

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Tissue plasminogen activatorAtrial fibrillationInternal medicineFibrinolytic agentMigraineThrombolysisVascular diseaseCardiologySurgeryMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The necessity for rapid evaluation and treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in acute ischemic stroke may increase the risk of administrating tPA to patients without a stroke (“stroke mimics”). Methods: Using data from the Get With The Guidelines Stroke Registry from 2009 to 2015, we identified 90,746 patients treated with tPA within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. We documented use of tPA in stroke mimics, defined as patients initially thought to have a stroke but without a final diagnosis of one, and compared patient characteristics and outcomes between tPA-treated mimics vs. ischemic strokes. Results: Overall, only 0.8% (728) of all tPA cases were given to stroke mimics, ranging from 0.2% in 2009 Q1 to 1.3% in 2015 Q1. The most common documented diagnoses in tPA-treated mimics were migraine (15.6%), functional disorder (9.4%), and seizure (7.2%). Compared with tPA-treated true stroke patients, tPA-treated mimics were younger (median 52 vs. 72 years), had lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, hypertension, heart failure, had less severe National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (median 7 vs. 10), but higher prevalence of prior stroke/transient ischemic attack (34.4% vs. 25.5%), all p<0.001. The door-to-needle times were similar in stroke mimics and true stroke groups (median 68 vs. 68 minutes, p=0.82). Rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) were quite rare in stroke mimic patients (0.4%, 3/728) as compared with 4.3% (3846/90018) in patients with an ischemic stroke; adjusted OR for sICH (0.19, 95% CI 0.06-0.58). The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in tPA-treated stroke mimics as compared with ischemic stroke patients (0.6% vs. 7.3%, adjusted OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.06-0.43). Conclusions: In this large nationwide cohort of patients treated with tPA, only 1 in 125 patients who received tPA for presumed stroke was a false positive and complication rates associated with tPA administration to stroke mimics were quite low. Nonetheless, there still may be opportunities to continue to improve the rapid and accurate diagnosis and treatment of ischemic stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→