MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2625963658

Mobile Design: Interactive Multimedia to Support Learning and Teaching" and "Mobile Library: Connecting New Generations of Learners to the Library in the Mobile Age"

2009· article· en· W2625963658 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hongxing Geng

Bibliographic record

VenueAUSpace (Athabasca University) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Learning in Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSession (web analytics)MultimediaPresentation (obstetrics)Computer scienceMobile deviceWorld Wide WebMobile technologyInterface (matter)Authentication (law)Computer securityOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I attended m-library 2009 conference on Jun 23-24, 2009 in Vancouver. I participated in two pre-conference workshops and made presentations as well. I made another presentation in session 13 of the conference with my colleagues.
\n
\nIn the pre-conference workshops, I presented “Mobile-friendly Knowledge Management System” (MKMS) which I developed for the conference. The workshop “Mobile Design: Interactive Multimedia to Support Learning and Teaching” includes a hands-on session to allow audiences to practice MKMS on desktop PCs and mobile phones. I received positive response from the audiences, such as the system is mobile-friendly, easy to use, and flexible, etc. They also suggested adding some functionality to the system, e.g. improving user input interface and adding authentication module.
\n
\nIn the session 13 held on Jun 24, I, along with Colin E and Guangbing Yang, presented “Create Mobile Content Using a Mobile-friendly Knowledge Management System: The Athabasca University Experience”. I gave more detailed information on MKMS. 
\n
\nI think my presentation was pretty successful since most of audiences expressed interest in MKMS and they gave us comments on it as well.
\n
\nIn the future, I will enhance the MKMS by adding functionality as follows:
\n•\tAuthentication and authorization modules
\n•\tQuiz module (at least it can handle multiple-choice questions)
\n•\tSearchable
\n•\tOAI-compatible
\n
\nIn general, people have interest in moving educational resources onto mobile devices. I will carry out research on mobile devices and find out how to make existing system available for mobile devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAUSpace (Athabasca University)Same topicMobile Learning in EducationFrench-language works237,207