Fundamental Investigation of Inkjet Deposition and Physical Immobilization of Horseradish Peroxidase on Cellulosic Substrates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, novel bio-inks formulated with horseradish peroxidase, HRP, and some additives were successfully developed for piezoelectric inkjet application. The optimized bio-ink formulation had a reliable jetting performance and maintained the biofunctionality before and after printing. The bio-ink also demonstrated a good storage life for up to 40 days at 4 oC with a negligible loss of biofunctionality. However, it was observed that some additives used in the bio-ink for obtaining necessary operational characteristics had detrimental effects on the enzyme activity. Especially, it was found that various viscosity modifiers typically used in commercial inkjet inks significantly impaired HRP activity prior to printing. Sodium Carboxymethyl Cellulose was shown to be an effective viscosity modifier that had no adverse effect on the biological activity of the HRP enzyme.\n\nUsing a confocal scanning fluorescent microscope, a method for characterizing the spatial distribution of the active enzyme within the cellulosic paper substrates after inkjet printing was developed. Interestingly, it was found that the active printed HRP enzyme was mostly located in the cell walls of the cellulosic fibers instead of near the pigments or fillers. \n\nIn an effort to better understand the fundamental interactions between the enzyme and the immobilization substrates, HRP adsorption isotherms on various substrate surfaces were obtained using the depletion method. The substrates included not only pulp fibers with varying degree of hydrophobicity and pigment and latex (the key materials used in papermaking), but also other types of cellulosic fibers of different morphologies, crystallinities, porosities, or surface charge densities. The influence on enzyme adsorption and inactivation behaviour of these substrates was compared with that of polystyrene beads (dialysed), which has been well studied in the literature. Results from this thesis indicated that hydrophobic interactions between the enzyme and the substrate surfaces had a major impact on the HRP adsorption behavior, while electrostatic interactions played a minor role. However, strong hydrophobic interactions could lead to enzyme inactivation. Research findings from this study suggested that cellulosic pulp fibers could be tailor-made into excellent enzyme immobilization supports by using existing fiber surface modification techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".