MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2626479176 · doi:10.1109/tbme.2017.2716365

eCurves: A Temporal Shape Encoding

2017· article· en· W2626479176 on OpenAlexaff
Elena Bernardis, Yong Zhang, Ender Konukoglu, Yangming Ou, Harold S. Javitz, Leon Axel, Dimitris Metaxas, Benoit Desjardins, Kilian M. Pohl

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsEigenfunctionEigenvalues and eigenvectorsArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Encoding (memory)Metric (unit)MathematicsComputer scienceAlgorithmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: This paper presents a framework for temporal shape analysis to capture the shape and changes of anatomical structures from three-dimensional+t(ime) medical scans. METHOD: We first encode the shape of a structure at each time point with the spectral signature, i.e., the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the Laplace operator. We then expand it to capture morphing shapes by tracking the eigenmodes across time according to the similarity of their eigenfunctions. The similarity metric is motivated by the fact that small-shaped deformations lead to minor changes in the eigenfunctions. Following each eigenmode from the beginning to end results in a set of eigenmode curves representing the shape and its changes over time. RESULTS: We apply our encoding to a cardiac dataset consisting of series of segmentations outlining the right and left ventricles over time. We measure the accuracy of our encoding by training classifiers on discriminating healthy adults from patients that received reconstructive surgery for Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). The classifiers based on our encoding significantly surpass deformation-based encodings of the right ventricle, the structure most impacted by TOF. CONCLUSION: The strength of our framework lies in its simplicity: It only assumes pose invariance within a time series but does not assume point-to-point correspondence across time series or a (statistical or physical) model. In addition, it is easy to implement and only depends on a single parameter, i.e., the number of curves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical EngineeringSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207