MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2626624331 · doi:10.17269/cjph.108.5708

Increased mortality among Indigenous persons in a multisite cohort of people living with HIV in Canada

2017· article· en· W2626624331 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Anita C. Benoit, Jaime Younger, Kerrigan Beaver, Randy Jackson, Mona Loutfy, Renée Masching, Tony Nobis, Earl Nowgesic, Doe O’Brien-Teengs, Wanda Whitebird, Art Zoccole, Mark Hull, Denise Jaworsky, Elizabeth Benson, Anita Rachlis, Sean B. Rourke, Ann N. Burchell, Curtis Cooper, Robert S. Hogg, Marina B. Klein, Nimâ Machouf, Joan Montaner, Chris Tsoukas, Janet Raboud

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Public Health · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalSunnybrook Health Science CentreMcGill University Health CentreSimon Fraser UniversityAssembly of First NationsAIDS VancouverOntario HIV Treatment NetworkLakehead UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaPublic Health OntarioCanadian Aboriginal AIDS Network2-SpiritedWomen's College HospitalMcMaster UniversityMaple Leaf Medical ClinicOttawa HospitalHealth Sciences CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMerck CanadaMinistry of Health, British ColumbiaNational Institute on Drug AbuseSimon Fraser UniversityViiV HealthcareGilead SciencesOntario HIV Treatment NetworkBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsDemographyMedicineEthnic groupHazard ratioCohortCartIndigenousProportional hazards modelPopulationCohort studyGerontologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Internal medicineConfidence intervalEnvironmental healthGeographyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes4
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Public Health→Same topicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions→French-language works237,207→