MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2626645510

From Ecosystem Services to Ecosystem Benefits: Unpacking the Links Between Ecosystems and Human Well-Being in Agricultural Communities in Costa Rica

2015· dissertation· en· W2626645510 on OpenAlex
Marta Berbes

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueYorkSpace (York University) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research CentreYork University
KeywordsEcosystem servicesMillennium Ecosystem AssessmentAgricultureEnvironmental resource managementGeographyEcosystemIndigenousEnvironmental planningCitizen journalismBusinessPolitical scienceEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation presents an exploration of the links between ecosystem services and human well-being in resource-dependent communities in diverse agricultural regions in Costa Rica. As such, this dissertation considers the key roles played by environmental management and environmental governance. In broad terms, the question that this dissertation examines is: How does the management of ecosystem services derived from agriculture impact human well-being in resource-dependent communities in Costa Rica? This dissertation has taken as a point of departure the framework proposed by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and has applied it to the examination of communities that are particularly vulnerable to environmental change. The focus on well-being brings to the forefront questions about the distribution of the benefits derived from ecosystems and highlights the perceptions of ecosystem-users. Three manuscripts make up this dissertation: The first manuscript uses a participatory method (photovoice) to elicit narratives about the ecosystems that impact the well-being of residents in the pineapple community of Volcán in South-Pacific Costa Rica. The manuscript offers a community-level perspective on the ecosystem services that contribute to the well-being of agricultural communities. The second manuscript focuses on how access and power relations affect the benefits experienced by Indigenous farmers in the Bribri Territory who produce plantains for sale in the national and international markets. The manuscript identifies how access to the means of production is gained, controlled and maintained within the social-ecological system of plantain agriculture. It also identifies the mechanisms that gatekeepers employ to exercise their power. The manuscript concludes with possible leverage points that could be used to challenge existing power relations and improve human well-being in the Bribri Indigenous Territory. The third manuscript presents three community-level assessments of well-being from agricultural regions on the Caribbean side of Costa Rica that have different environmental management systems ranging from large-scale monocrop banana plantations in Matina to agroforestry in the Bribri Indigenous Territory. The analysis investigates the ways in which different systems of resource extraction shape well-being at the local level. In brief, the dissertation offers insights for improving the theoretical and empirical understandings of how changes in ecosystems affect human well-being in resource-dependent communities. It also offers suggestions to render the ecosystem services framework more relevant to guide environmental management at the micro-scale and in the context of poverty alleviation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it