From campus to creative quarter: constructing industry identities in creative places
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction In 2006, the first phase in the conversion of a former paintworks into the ‘Paintworks’ creative quarter in Bristol was completed. Paintworks is owned by Verve Properties – a limited company with the stated aim to ‘reposition property into higher value markets’ (Verve Properties n.d.). The mix of studio/offices, live/ work and residential spaces were presented to allow ‘occupiers full rein to fulfil their needs and fantasies’ (Paintworks 2015a). Developing in phases over time, the Paintworks creative quarter has become the home to a diverse range of businesses including: architecture, advertising agency, web design, film production, hospitality designers, a dental surgery and a distributor of epoxy resins (Paintworks 2015b, 2015c). As would be anticipated with the creative quarter framing, the majority of businesses self-define themselves in relation to creative, cultural and media activities. There are also clear instances where businesses that form part of a related production process come together. For example, the Paintworks website (2015b) includes details of MCMC SUPPLY who provide ‘essentials to the replication and model-making industry’ and ScaryCat Studio who provide ‘modelmaking and design services within the film, television & advertising industries’ – all industries located at Paintworks and within the Bristol area more widely, for example at Spike Island. Given this range of commercial operations, Paintworks was selected by Bath Spa University as the site for Artswork Media – a creative digital agency run by media professionals and thirdyear students on the BA Creative Media Practice course.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.030 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.022 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".