MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Smart Map Sharing and Preloading Scheme for Mobile Cloud Gaming in D2D Networks

2017· article· en· W2626948743 on OpenAlexaff
Ziqiao Lin, Zehua Wang, Wei Cai, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingComputer networkServerMobile deviceUploadCellular networkMobile computingWireless networkMobile telephonyMobile cloud computingCacheWirelessLatency (audio)Context (archaeology)Distributed computingMobile radioTelecommunicationsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the high popularizing rate of smart devices, mobile gaming is an emerging arena in game industry with the purpose of providing ubiquitous game services to mobile players. Different from the traditional player who play games on their personal computers with wired local area network or WiFi access, more and more mobile players nowadays prefer to play online games on their smart devices that communicate to cloud servers via wireless cellular networks. Therefore, in the mobile cloud gaming context, the monetary cost of downloading or updating map files in games via cellular networks is a new issue that may effect players' experience. On the other hand, an unpredictable latency may be introduced by the wireless links in the cellular network. In fact, a mobile player can preload the maps that he has high probability to go. Moreover, mobile players nearby can also form a device-to-device (D2D) communication network to share their cached maps. In this paper, we consider the problem that with the limited storage space available on each player's device, how to select the maps on either neighboring devices or cloud server to preload so that the utility of the player can be maximized. We first formula an optimization problem and then present our solution. Simulation results show that our proposed map sharing and preloading scheme can significantly increase the utility received by mobile players.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207