MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Adverse health outcomes in relationship to hypogonadism (HG) after platinum-based chemotherapy: A multicenter study of North American testicular cancer survivors (TCS).

2017· article· en· W2626989451 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Issam Abu Zaid, Alvaro G. Menendez, Omar El Charif, Chunkit Fung, Patrick O. Monahan, Darren R. Feldman, Robert J. Hamilton, David J. Vaughn, Clair J. Beard, Ryan Cook, Sandra K. Althouse, Howard D. Sesso, Shirin Ardeshir‐Rouhani‐Fard, Paul C. Dinh, Lawrence H. Einhorn, Sophie D. Fosså, Lois B. Travis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSex hormone-binding globulinInternal medicineGenotypingAdverse effectPopulationHazard ratioGynecologyEndocrinologyHormoneGenotypeConfidence intervalGeneticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LBA10012 Background: HG affects a substantial percentage of TCS and can contribute to significant morbidity, but few studies have examined the relationship between HG and adverse health outcomes (AHO), taking into account genetic variation. Methods: Eligible TCS were < 55 y at diagnosis and treated with only first line chemotherapy after 1990. TCS underwent physical exams and genotyping, and completed questionnaires regarding 16 AHO and health behaviors. HG was defined as serum testosterone ≤ 3.0 ng/mL or the use of testosterone replacement therapy. Results: We evaluated 491 TCS. Median age at evaluation was 38 y (range 19-68). 38.5% had HG. Two SNPs in the sex-hormone-binding globulin ( SHBG) locus previously implicated in increased HG risk in the general population (Ohlsson et al, PLOS Genetics 2011) displayed effect sizes consistent with prior reports (rs6258, OR = 1.3; rs12150660, OR = 0.79), but were not statistically significant. However, TCS with ≥ 2 risk alleles for the two SNPs in the SHBG locus vs no risk alleles had 2-fold increased risk for HG (OR = 2.2, P = .12). Multivariate analysis identified risk factors for HG including: age (OR = 1.4 per 10 year increase, P = .007), and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (OR = 2.2, P = .003). Vigorous-intensity physical activity appeared protective (OR = 0.6, P = .06). Type of chemotherapy regimen and socioeconomic factors did not correlate with HG. Only 35% of TCS with HG vs 49% of those without HG reported none or 1 AHO ( P = .003). TCS with HG were more likely to take medications for dyslipidemia (20% vs 6%, P < .001), hypertension (19% vs 11%, P = .01), erectile dysfunction (ED) (20% vs 12%, P = .02), diabetes (6% vs 3%, P = .07), or anxiety/depression (15% vs 10%, P = 0.06) compared to TCS with normal levels, and also to have peripheral neuropathy (PN) (31% vs 23%, P = .04). HG status did not correlate with oto- or renal toxicity. Conclusions: Over a third of TCS have HG at a relatively young age. HG was associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk factors, ED, and PN. SHBG polymorphisms appear important in TCS, but our study was underpowered to confirm an association. Providers should screen TCS for HG and treat those who are symptomatic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.386 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicTesticular diseases and treatments→French-language works237,207→