MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2627022647 · doi:10.1002/acs.2790

Robust adaptive output‐feedback control for a class of nonlinear systems with hysteresis compensation controller

2017· article· en· W2627022647 on OpenAlexaff
Xiuyu Zhang, Zhi Li, Chun‐Yi Su, Yan Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPiezoelectric Actuators and Control
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemInitializationHysteresisNorm (philosophy)Bounded functionAdaptive controlObserver (physics)Tracking errorController (irrigation)Robustness (evolution)Robust controlCompensation (psychology)MathematicsComputer scienceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary In this paper, a robust adaptive output‐feedback dynamic surface control scheme is proposed for a class of single‐input single‐output nonlinear systems preceded by unknown hysteresis with the following features: (1) a hysteresis compensator is designed in the control signal to compensate the hysteresis nonlinearities with only the availability of the output of the control system; (2) by estimating the norm of the unknown parameter vector and the maximum value of the hysteresis density function, the number of the estimated parameters is reduced, which implies that the computational burden is greatly reduced; (3) by introducing the initializing technique, the initial conditions of the state observer and adaptive laws of unknown parameters can be properly chosen, and the arbitrarily small norm of the tracking error is achieved. It is proved that all the signals in the closed‐loop system are ultimately uniformly bounded and can be arbitrarily small. Simulation results show the validity of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal ProcessingSame topicPiezoelectric Actuators and ControlFrench-language works237,207