MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2630484000 · doi:10.55016/ojs/ajer.v62i4.55489

Stratosphere: Integrating Technology, Pedagogy, and Change Knowledge (2013) by Michael Fullan

2017· article· en· W2630484000 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Libbi R. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Journal of Educational Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInformation Systems Theories and Implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedagogySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fullan suggests a framework for approaching education in the 21 st century.Stratosphere exists at the intersection of three elements: technology, pedagogy, and change knowledge.In the text, Fullan provides a detailed description of the Stratosphere's complex nature and interconnected components.Stratosphere is Fullan's response to the static state of schooling and the disconnect between educational practices and the ever-changing needs of society.Fullan expresses discouragement with today's educational system.He writes that current educational reforms have fallen short of making progress and that they focus on the wrong part of learning.Educational reforms are concentrated on standards and assessment and neglect to teach students how to learn or to foster love for learning.This leads to diminished enthusiasm and engagement.In early childhood, students are naturally excited and interested in learning but by the time they reach high school, this drive is almost gone.Fullan contends that both students and teachers are bored, and instructional practices are limited by the larger structure of schools.This is the impetus for Stratosphere, which focuses on creating highly engaging, technologically driven, and learner-centered environments.In contrast to current educational trends that stress testing and content, Stratosphere is driven by pedagogy.The pedagogical approach in Stratosphere emphasizes student engagement, strong teacher-student relationships, and teaching that is tied to constructivist theory.Students determine their own passions, address real-life problems, work collaboratively to find solutions, and push through challenges with the aid of constructive feedback.This pedagogy is closely tied to learner-centered instruction (Weimer, 2013).Learner-centered instruction deliberately includes students in the process of creating their knowledge and empowers the students with control over their learning.It embraces creativity and encourages the development of a classroom community through collaborative learning experiences.Fullan writes that "the magic of Stratosphere is that students and teachers are conjointly stimulated to engage in the pursuit of deeper learning: it is fueled by their passions and purposes.Both students and their teachers are turned on" (p.22, emphasis in original).In Stratosphere, teachers and students search for knowledge together.The teacher is no longer the distributor of information but a facilitator of learning.In this setting, curriculum shifts away from focusing on set answers and tasks involving lower levels of cognitive demands.Instead, learning becomes an intricate journey or a "complicated conversation" (Reeder, 2005, p. 248) with teachers and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlberta Journal of Educational ResearchSame topicInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207