Molecular Mechanisms Of Neuroinflammation Following Global Cerebral Ischemia: The Role of Hypothermia Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypothermia therapy (HT) is used clinically following global cerebral ischemia (GCI) but its therapeutic mechanisms are not completely understood. An elucidation of such mechanisms may lead to novel therapeutic approaches that improve patient outcome. Using a murine model of GCI, we determined the effect of HT on the expression of inflammatory proteins in the hippocampus and serum. We also examined its effect on microglia/macrophage activation and neurodegeneration in the brain at 72 hours following ischemia, and its effect on long-term spatial memory/learning and contextual fear response. GCI led to increased neurodegeneration and microglia/macrophage activation in the hippocampus, and increased IL-1β and KC protein expression in the hippocampus at 72 hours. Hypothermia therapy attenuated these inflammatory responses. It also improved spatial learning/memory at 7 and 21 days, and preserved contextual fear response 21 days post-ischemia. Hypothermia therapy attenuated the post-ischemic inflammatory response, protected hippocampal neurons, and preserved long-term memory and learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".