MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2636465165 · doi:10.15407/rpra19.04.375

HIGH SENSITIVITY 0.5 TO 19.5 GHZ RECEIVER WITH 1.1-GHZ INSTANTANEOUS BANDWIDTH

2014· article· en· W2636465165 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V. A. Volkov, D. M. Vavriv, E. V. Bulakh, А. Кравцов

Bibliographic record

VenueRadio physics and radio astronomy · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSuperconducting and THz Device Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelecommunicationsPhysicsElectrical engineeringTel avivLibrary scienceEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Описывается широкополосный высокочувствительный свервысокочастотный приемник, способный принимать сигналы в диапазоне 0.5÷19 ГГц с мгновенной полосой 1.1 ГГц. Приемник имеет коэффициент шума не превышающий 10 дБ и точку интермодуляции 3-го порядка по входу, достигающую +10 дБм. Приемник отличается также малым уровнем внутренних паразитных сигналов и крайне низкими значениями внутренних фазовых шумов. Приведены и обсуждаются основные принципы построения приемника. Ключевые слова: приемник, широкополосный, малошумящий, СВЧ Статья поступила в редакцию 09.09.2014 Radio phys. radio astron. 2014, 19(4): 375-380 СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ 1. Neri F. Introduction to Electronic Defense Systems, 2nd ed. – Artech House, 2006. 2. Tsui J. Microwave Receivers With Electronic Warfare Applications. Corrected Reprint. – Raleigh, NC: SciTech Publishing, 2005. 3. Multi-Carrier and Spread Spectrum Systems: From OFDM and MC-CDMA to LTE and WiMAX, 2nd Ed. – John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2008. 4. Goldsmith A. Wireless Communications. – New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 5. Rembovsky A., Ashikhmin A., Kozmin V., and Smolskiy S. M. Radio Monitoring. – Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer, 2009. 6. Simon M., Omura J., Scholtz R., and Levitt B. Spread Spectrum Communications Handbook. – New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Lisbon, London, Madrid, Mexico City, Milan, New Delhi, San Juan, Seoul, Singapore, Sydney, Toronto: McGraw-Hill Professional, 2001. 7. Wicks M. C., Mokole E. L., Blunt S. D., Schneible R. S., and Amuso V. J. Principles of Waveform Diversity and Design. – Raleigh, NC: Sci Tech Publishing, 2011. 8. Bezvesilniy O. O., Vavriv D. M., Vinogradov V. V., Volkov V. A., and Kozhin R. V. Synthetic Aperture Radar Systems for Light-Weight Aircrafts // Uspehi sovremennoy radioelektroniki. – 2012. – No. 12. – P. 53–61, (in Russian). 9. Rudersdorfer R. Radio Receiver Technology: Principles, Architectures and Applications. – John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2014. 10. Drentea C. Modern Communications Receiver Design and Technology. – Artech House, 2010. 11. Marki F. and Marki C. T3 Mixer Primer, App. Note. – Morgan Hill, CA: Marki Microwave. 12. Teppati V., Ferrero A., and Sayed M. , editors, Modern RF and Microwave Measurement Techniques. – New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadio physics and radio astronomySame topicSuperconducting and THz Device TechnologyFrench-language works237,207