MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2636810058 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2017.7952893

A data centric approach to utility change detection in online social media

2017· article· en· W2636810058 on OpenAlexaff
Anup Aprem, Vikram Krishnamurthy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicData-Driven Disease Surveillance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarketing buzzComputer scienceSocial mediaGround truthOnline advertisingFunction (biology)Point (geometry)PreferenceChange detectionMaximizationData miningArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMathematical optimizationThe InternetMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers the problem of detecting changes in utility maximizing behaviour of agents in online social media. Such changes in utility maximizing behaviour in online social media occur due to the effect of marketing, advertising, or changes in ground truth. In contrast to traditional signal processing techniques, our approach is data-centric. We use the framework of revealed preference to detect the unknown time point (change point) at which the utility function changed. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions for detecting the change point. In addition, we provide an algorithm to recover the utility function before and after the change point. The results developed are illustrated on the Yahoo! Tech Buzz dataset. From the dataset, we obtain the following useful insights: First, the changes in ground truth affecting the utility of the agent can be detected by utility maximization behaviour in online search. Second, the recovered utility functions satisfy the single crossing property indicating strategic substitute behaviour in online search.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.206
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData-Driven Disease SurveillanceFrench-language works237,207