MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2638029806

Proceedings of the Expert Panel Meeting on the Potential Risks Associated with Horizontal Gene Transfer from Novel Aquatic Organisms

2010· other· en· W2638029806 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rice Jake, Kornelia Smalla, Van Den Eede Guy, Wilfried Wackernagel, D Turney Robert

Bibliographic record

VenueJoint Research Centre (European Commission) · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetically Modified Organisms Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHorizontal gene transferComputer scienceRisk analysis (engineering)BusinessBiologyGeneGeneticsPhylogenetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under the New Substances Notification Regulations (Organisms) (NSNR, Organisms) of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA 1999), research and development (R&D) involving animate products of biotechnology is exempt from regulatory notification if there is no release of the living organism, material from the organism involved in toxicity, or genetic material from the organism. This exemption is currently being reviewed by Environment Canada and Health Canada.\nFisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) administers the NSNR for aquatic organisms with novel traits on behalf of Environment Canada and Health Canada. This includes the conduct of assessments of potential risks to the environment and human health of aquatic organisms with novel traits. In addition, DFO is developing new regulations specific to novel aquatic organisms. The potential risk associated with horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of genetic material from aquatic organisms with novel traits is an issue\nthat requires consideration in the design of these regulations.\nTo address this, Fisheries and Oceans Canada commissioned a literature review and discussion document of the persistence of DNA in the environment, mechanisms for HGT, known occurrence of HGT, and potential risks associated with HGT. A scientific panel of experts was convened to address specific questions, based on the discussion document, on potential risks associated with HGT. This report summarizes the considerations and output from the expert panel and will be used to inform the regulatory amendment and the development of new regulations for novel aquatic\norganisms.\nHorizontal gene transfer is a very rare event that is more likely between prokaryotes than between eukaryotes or eukaryotes and prokaryotes.\nThe potential consequences of HGT are important. Case-by-case evaluation of potential consequences of HGT from novel organisms will help to identify what further information may be required to complete an environmental risk assessment. This tiered approach will ensure that the allocation of risk management is in line with potential identified risks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJoint Research Centre (European Commission)Same topicGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchFrench-language works237,207