L'articulation des identités féministe et féminine chez les lectrices de Châtelaine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article presente les resultats d’une etude sur les representations du feminisme chez les lectrices de Châtelaine en s’attardant a l’articulation de leurs identites feministes et feminines. En tant que categories identitaires, ces dernieres sont parfois positionnees comme contradictoires, notamment par le discours postfeministe qui emerge dans les produits de culture populaire depuis les annees 1990. L’etude vise a mieux comprendre la relation complexe qu’entretiennent les lectrices de Châtelaine avec ce magazine ainsi qu’a identifier en quoi leurs conceptions du feminisme sont liees au discours postfeministe. Des entretiens semi-diriges ont ete conduits avec dix lectrices du magazine. Ces derniers revelent que les participantes remettent generalement en question les frontieres entre les identites feministes et feminines. Elles les expriment parfois comme des univers distincts de leur subjectivite, deconstruisent certaines conceptions stereotypees de ces termes ou les articulent autour d’un repertoire discursif de libre choix et d’ouverture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".