Preseason performance on cervical, vestibular and divided attention measures in youth ice hockey players
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To determine preseason values on cervical, vestibular and divided attention measures in youth ice hockey players aged 10-14 years Design Cross-Sectional study Setting Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, Alberta, Canada Participants Youth Ice Hockey players (n=934, age 10-14 years). Outcome measures Numeric pain rating scores for neck pain, headache, dizziness; Cervical flexor endurance test (CFE), cervical flexion rotation test (CFRT), cervical spine strength, head perturbation test, functional gait assessment (FGA), walking while talking test (WWTT), head thrust test and dynamic visual acuity (DVA). Main results Symptoms of neck pain, headaches and dizziness were reported by 17%, 18% and 10% of participants respectively. The median time of CFE was 27.0 seconds (IQR: 19.9, 40.7). CFRT was positive in 52 (6.2%) participants. Median anterolateral cervical spine strength was 8.0 lbs (IQR: 6.1, 10.3) right and 7.8 lbs (IQR: 6.0, 10.1) left. 13% of participants were unable to maintain a stationary head position when an external force was applied. 48% of participants performed less than perfect on the FGA. Time to complete a complex task while walking increased 40 foot walking time by a median of 6.4 seconds (IQR: 4.0, 10.3). Head thrust test was positive in 33 (3.7%) participants. Clinical DVA score was a median of 0.2 logMar (IQR: 0.1, 0.3). Conclusions Symptoms are common at baseline and outcomes on many commonly used clinical tests may be different for healthy 10-14 year olds compared to the adult literature. These findings form an important reference point for the interpretation of post-injury testing. Competing interests None.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".