MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2643564286 · doi:10.1190/geo2016-0123.1

Seismic inversion for geologic fractures and fractured media

2017· article· en· W2643564286 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoqin Cui, Edward S. Krebes, Laurence R. Lines

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySeismogramWave equationAmplitudeReflection (computer programming)Inversion (geology)Amplitude versus offsetElectrical impedanceAnelastic attenuation factorSeismic waveMathematical analysisNonlinear systemSlip (aerodynamics)GeometrySeismologyMathematicsOpticsPhysicsTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Amplitude variation with offset (AVO) inversion attempts to use the available surface seismic data to estimate the density, P-wave velocity, and S-wave velocity of the earth model. Under linear slip interface theory, synthetic seismograms for models with fractures prove that fractures are also reflection generators. Consequently, observed reflections are not necessarily due to lithologic variations only, but they could be due in part to the effect of fractures. To obtain approximate equations for AVO inversion for fractured media, denoted by AVO with fracture (AVOF), we derived new equations for PP-wave reflection and transmission coefficients that are based on nonwelded contact boundary conditions. In particular, along with the fracture compliances, azimuth has also been taken into account in the equations because the fractures can have any orientation. The new approximate AVOF equations for a horizontally fractured medium with impedance contrast are developed by simplifying the equations for the new PP-wave reflection and transmission coefficients. In the new approximate AVOF equations, the reflection coefficients are divided into a welded contact part (a conventional impedance contrast part) and a nonwelded contact part (a fracture part). This makes the equations flexible enough to separately invert for the rock properties of the fracture and the background medium in the case of a fractured medium with impedance contrast. The new approximate AVOF equations state that fractures could cause the seismic reflectivity to be frequency dependent, and that the fractures not only influence the wave amplitude but also change the wave phase. The linear least-squares and nonlinear conjugate gradient inversion algorithms are applied to estimate the elastic reflectivity using the new approximate AVOF equations. The inverted results for seismic data for a horizontally fractured medium with impedance contrast are evaluated to find a more accurate delineation of the subsurface rock properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207