MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W26455469 · doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2015.10.001

Tubes for microscopes

2011· article· en· W26455469 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hochschule Emden Leer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMicroscopeComputer scienceOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To grow out to contact target neurons an axon uses its distal tip, the growth cone, as a sensor of molecular cues that help the axon make appropriate guidance decisions at a series of choice points along the journey. In the developing visual system, the axons of the output cells of the retina, the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), cross the brain midline at the optic chiasm. Shortly after, they grow past the brain entry point of the optic nerve arising from the contralateral eye, and extend dorso-caudally through the diencephalon towards their optic tectum target. Using the developing visual system of the experimentally amenable model Xenopus laevis, we find that RGC axons are normally prevented from entering the contralateral optic nerve. This mechanism requires the activity of a Rho-associated kinase, Rock, known to function downstream of a number of receptors that recognize cues that guide axons. Pharmacological inhibition of Rock in an in vivo brain preparation causes mis-entry of many RGC axons into the contralateral optic nerve, and this defect is partially phenocopied by selective disruption of Rock signaling in RGC axons. These data implicate Rock downstream of a molecular mechanism that is critical for RGC axons to be able to ignore a domain, the optic nerve, which they previously found attractive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207