MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2647951630

The oocyte regulates GDF9 and BMP15 expression in bovine cumulus cells

2016· article· en· W2647951630 on OpenAlexaff
P. F. Lima, Rodrigo Garcia Barros, Jhessica Naomi Sakoda, Ana Caroline Silva Soares, Christopher A. Price, J. Buratini

Bibliographic record

VenueAnimal Reproduction · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsCegep de Saint Hyacinthe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrowth differentiation factor-9OocyteBone morphogenetic protein 15BiologyAndrologyCumulus oophorusEndocrinologyFolliculogenesisInternal medicineCell biologyEmbryogenesisEmbryoMedicineGeneGeneticsBone morphogenetic protein
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unlike in the mouse, the presence of the oocyte is not required for expansion of the cumulus-oocyte complex (COC) in cattle. However, we have previously demonstrated that oocyte secreted factors, although not absolutely required, do enhance cumulus expansion in cattle. Major oocyte secreted factors regulating COC maturation are members of the TGFβ family, BMP15 and GDF9. Previous data suggest that BMP15 and GDF9 are expressed in bovine cumulus cells. Thus, the existence of an intra-cumulus loop mediated by TGFβ signalling in cattle constitutes an interesting hypothesis. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that BMP15 and GDF9 are expressed in cumulus cells during IVM in cattle and that mRNA abundance is regulated by the oocyte.COCs were aspirated from follicles 3-8 mm in diameter and COCs (grade 1 or 2) were divided in three groups: intact COCs (COC), oocytectomized COCs (OOX), and OOX plus denuded oocytes (DO). Oocytectomy was performed by aspiration of the ooplasm with a micromanipulator. COCs were matured in groups of 20 for 4 or 22 hours (n = 4/time). IVM was performed in TCM199 with Earl’s salts supplemented with either FSH (1µg/mL) or AREG (100 µg/mL), 0.4% BSA, 22 µg/Ml sodium pyruvate, 75µg/mL of amikacin at 38,5°C and 5.5%CO2 in humid atmosphere. Abundance of mRNA encoding BMP15 and GDF9 in cumulus cells was assessed by real-time RT-PCR using Power SybrGreen (LifeTech®) and CYC-A as the housekeeping gene. Effects of treatments were analysed by ANOVA and groups were compared with the Tukey test.Expression of BMP15 and GDF9 mRNA was detected in bovine cumulus cells. PCR cycle numbers were on average 29 and 28 for BMP15 and GDF9, respectively, at 4 hours of culture, and 29 and 31, at 22 hours of culture. Oocytectomy significantly reduced BMP15 and GDF9 mRNA expression in COCs cultured with AREG for 4 or 22 hours, but not with FSH. Co-culture of OOX with DO restored BMP15 and GDF9 expression . In conclusion, these data suggest that BMP15 and GDF9 mRNA expression in bovine cumulus cells is regulated by the oocyte. This effect is abolished by supra-physiological levesl of FSH used in IVM in cattle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnimal ReproductionSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207