« Visiochat » et blogue : une combinaison efficace pour le suivi à distance des étudiants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The videoconference, a synchronous collaborative tool, makes it possible to geographically distant people to be seen and dialogue orally in real time.A contrario, the weblog (blog) is an asynchronous collaborative tool like a Web site supplied with texts, hyperlinks and/or images published without control, by a single author, on a purely personal basis.In the university context, videoconference and blog have many advantages in particular for the follow-up of the students in training course .We will discuss the interest of the videoconference to maintain cohesion within the group, and of the blog as a virtual laboratory book.Résumé La visioconférence, outil collaboratif synchrone, permet à des personnes géographiquement distantes de se voir et de dialoguer oralement en temps réel .A contrario, le weblog (ou blogue) est un outil collaboratif asynchrone apparenté à un site Web alimenté par des textes, des liens hypertextes et/ou des images publiés au fil de l'eau, par un auteur unique, à titre personnel.Dans le contexte universitaire, visioconférence et blogue présentent de nombreux avantages, notamment pour le suivi des étudiants en stage .Nous discuterons de l'intérêt de la visioconférence pour maintenir la cohésion au sein du groupe, et du blogue comme cahier de laboratoire virtuel .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".