Effect of exogenous retinoic acid on tooth movement and periodontium healing following tooth extraction in a rat model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of isotretinoin on orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) and wound healing following exodontia. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Sixteen 40-day-old male Wistar rats were divided into two groups: (a) OTM and (b) tooth extraction (TE) of the upper 1st molar and OTM. The experimental animals were treated with isotretinoin (7.5 mg/kg) and the control animals with oil solution for 37 days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The OTM and bone volume were evaluated by the micro-CT and the periodontium healing was assessed by immunohistochemistry for VEGF-C, COX-2 and IL-1ß. RESULTS: The animals of both groups submitted to the TE showed a statistically significant decrease in the bone volume percentage and increase in OTM. No significant difference of OTM and bone volume was observed between the control and experimental group. However, the alveolar bone of the isotretinoin group revealed more medullary spaces with inflammatory, hematopoietic cells, blood vessels and intense immunolabeling for VEGF-C. This group also showed faster gingival regeneration. No significant difference was observed in the COX-2 and IL-1ß labelings following TE between both groups. CONCLUSION: The isotretinoin did not affect the OTM nor did it cause an alteration in maxillary bone volume. This exogenous acid may contribute to the acceleration of gingival healing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".