MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2664221690 · doi:10.3749/canmin.1600018

Garronite-Na, A New Zeolite Species From Mont Saint-Hilaire, Québec

2016· article· en· W2664221690 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Joel D. Grice, Ralph Rowe, Glenn Poirier

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicClay minerals and soil interactions
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSAINTZeoliteHumanitiesMaterials scienceChemistryArtOrganic chemistryArt historyCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Garronite-Na, ideally Na 6 (Al 6 Si 10 O 32 ) · 7–10H 2 O, a new mineral species, was found in the Mont Saint-Hilaire quarry, Quebec. It occurs in vugs in sodalite syenite. The crystals are transparent to translucent, pale yellow in color, with a white streak and vitreous luster. Crystal aggregates are botryoidal masses up to 1.5 mm in size. The mineral is brittle with a good {011} parting. Associated minerals include aegirine, natrolite, gmelinite, and gonnardite. Garronite-Na is monoclinic, space group I 2, with unit-cell parameters refined from single crystal X-ray diffraction data: a 9.990(2), b 10.032(2), c 10.036(2) A, β 90.11(3)°, V 1005.8(7) A 3 , and Z = 1. Electron microprobe analyses give (average of eight with ranges): Na 2 O 14.28 (10.38–18.55), K 2 O 1.10 (0.51–3.07), CaO 0.04 (0.01–0.11), MnO 0.02 (0.00–0.09), BaO 0.09 (0.00–0.44), FeO 0.02 (0.00–0.07), Al 2 O 3 26.89 (25.71–28.96), Nb 2 O 5 0.04 (0.00–0.10), SiO 2 46.71 (42.65–49.32), TiO 2 0.00 (0.00–0.02), H 2 O 10.73 (10.22–11.22) (determined by crystal structure analysis), total 99.92 wt.%. The empirical formula, based on the crystal-structure analysis and ideally showing 16 (Si + Al) and 32 O atoms in the framework and 7.3 H 2 O groups is: (Na 5.650 K 0.286 Ca 0.009 Ba 0.007 Mn 0.003 Fe 0.003 Nb 0.004 ) ∑5.960 (Al 6.468 Si 9.532 ) ∑16 O 32 ·7.3H 2 O + (O 0.67 ). Garronite-Na is biaxial positive, α = 1.489 ± 0.001, β = 1.492 ± 0.001, γ = 1.496 ± 0.001, 2 V meas. = 75(3)°, 2 V calc = 82(7)°. The strongest eight reflections of the X-ray powder-diffraction pattern [ d (obs.) in A ( I ) ( hkl )] are: 7.098 (79) (011, 110), 5.026 (32) (002, 200), 4.101 (77) (112, , , 121), 3.172 (013, 031, 130, 310), 2.904 (14) (, 222), 2.685 (64) (123, ), 1.9669 (14) (015, , 341, 510), 1.7213 (11) (, 053, 350, 433). The Mohs hardness is ∼4; D (meas.) = 2.19(2) and D (calc.) = 2.071 g/cm 3 . The structure has been refined to an R index of 0.056 for 2952 unique, observed reflections. The structure is a Si/Al–O framework like that of gismondine with Na atoms and H 2 O groups in the cages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicClay minerals and soil interactionsFrench-language works237,207